Search Blog Entries
Feeds for this site
References and Recommendations

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Contact and login
Currently Reading
  • Furies: War in Europe, 1450-1700
    Furies: War in Europe, 1450-1700
    by Lauro Martines
  • Sweet Tooth
    Sweet Tooth
    by Ian McEwan
  • The Invisible Hands: Top Hedge Fund Traders on Bubbles, Crashes, and Real Money
    The Invisible Hands: Top Hedge Fund Traders on Bubbles, Crashes, and Real Money
    by Steven Drobny
Powered by Squarespace

Adjusting to the Fundamentals?

money.jpgIt all depends on the state mind I guess but I for one am not surprised by this ...

(From Bloomberg - bold parts are my emphasis)

The dollar rose to a three-week high against the euro after a report showed foreign investors boosted purchases of U.S. securities in October.

The U.S. currency is also heading for its biggest weekly advance since September versus the yen as the report allayed concern international investors would shun U.S. assets because of the nation's trade deficit. The dollar also gained today against the British pound and Swiss franc.

``We are still seeing foreign inflow into U.S. assets,'' said Alan Ruskin, head of international currency strategy in North America at RBS Greenwich Capital Markets Inc. in Greenwich, Connecticut. ``It seems like the U.S. doesn't have a problem attracting foreign investment.''

The U.S. currency advanced to $1.3085 per euro at 12:22 p.m. in New York from $1.3144 late yesterday, reversing an earlier drop on a separate report showing U.S. inflation is in check. The dollar has gained 1.4 percent this week to 117.98 yen, and reached a four-week high of 118.33 yen earlier. It is up about 0.9 percent this week against the euro.

The U.S. currency has gained 0.1 percent this year against the yen. It is still down 9.5 percent versus the euro as investors bet the European Central Bank will lift borrowing costs more than the Fed

My comment above about 'state of mind' is important since the fundamentals are exactly what we should be talking about. Consequently, the fundamentals would indeed seem to point to the need for the dollar to depreciate to correct the current account deficit or more specifically as a part of the overall mechanism (a recession?) which forces the US consumers to save more and spend less subsequently grinding down the excess demand typified in the large trade deficit. Yet, as I have tried to flesh out recently, there are another set of fundamentals we would be wise also to take a look at before we go out and hail the major dollar-meltdown. Another point I want to make is about the nature of the recent wobbles in the dollar which flushed a lot of pre-mature comments pointing to a impending re-balancing act (The Economist anyone :)). What we are seeing now is, I think, evidence that the recent dollar slide was driven by the expected narrowing of interest differentials between the FED and the ECB. Remember, that Trichet practically was locked in to raise back in the beginning of this month as a function of the ECB's own discourse. But also as a result of the ongoing struggle between the ECB and Eurozone policy makers and civil society; the ECB could not pause on the back of pressures from policy circles, even if it was the right choice in terms of the economic indicators.


Immigration's Impact on the Economy ... Evidence from the UK

money.jpgNot too long ago (in Novembe) I reported on the the issues and dilemmas of the Bank of England in pushing up the interest rate to 5%. I am not an ardent watcher of the UK economy so I was pretty much taking the media commentaries at face value speaking about how the perception that the economy was flirting with spare capacity and thus the inflation risk merited a raise. However, more importantly something about immigration and spare capacity or in this case potential output also caught my eye ... this quote from The Economist sums ups excellently;

Just how big an impact higher immigration is having on potential output goes to the heart of the rate-setters' dilemma. On the face of it, there has been a spectacular expansion in the workforce since 2004. Around half a million migrants from eastern Europe have started working in Britain over the past two years. Thanks also to the return of older people to work, the labour force has been growing at its fastest rate for more than 20 years.

This suggests that the bank should be pushing up its estimate of potential output. The migration figures are notoriously poor and difficult to interpret, however. For example, some of the newcomers from eastern Europe have returned home, yet timely estimates of this outflow are not available.

This is indeed interesting is it not? Obviously, the theory here is not particularly difficult since we are simply talking about a de-facto augementation of the labour supply which quite naturally should show a rather direct transmission mechanism with potential output. However, we are leaving out important questions such as for example the nature and properties of the immigration. Apparently, the recent debate about immigration's effect on the economy has gotten some people at the Bank of England's research unit thinking and consequently the just published quarterly bulletin features, among other things, an in-depth article about immigration's effect on the supply in the economy. The article is clearly UK biased but still there are some general points to take away.

An increase in the number of immigrants, other things being equal, would raise the supply potential of the economy. But the extent to which potential supply increases will depend on the economic characteristics of immigrants. This article investigates the characteristics of immigrants, particularly new immigrants — those who have entered the United Kingdom in the past two years. It appears that new immigrants are more educated than both UK-born workers and previous immigrant waves, but are much more likely to be working in low-skilled occupations. The increasing share of new immigrants in low-skill, low-paid jobs seems to have led to the emergence of a gap between the wages of new immigrants and UK-born workers. The implications of these findings for overall productivity and the supply side of
the economy are complex.


These different possibilities and the difficulty of quantifying the impact of immigration on wages, productivity and the
natural rate of unemployment, demonstrate that the implications for overall productivity and the supply side of the
economy are complex. And, of course, the overall impact on inflation is determined by the extent to which immigration
affects the balance between supply and demand in the economy.

There might not be any decisive theoretical message from this paper but still it is good crack at answering a tough question in a specific economic context and as such it merits some thought I think.